Optimizing Wastewater Aeration Control for Process Stability and Cost Savings

Aeration is the backbone of biological wastewater treatment driving the breakdown of organics and conversion of toxic nitrogen compounds, yet it accounts for 45-75% of a plant’s total energy use.

This range was first quantified by Rosso et al. (2008) and has been confirmed in full‐scale surveys and modelling work ever since. Continuous optimization of aeration control is therefore the key to driving both energy and cost savings in wastewater treatment.

As discharge regulations tighten and energy costs climb, conventional Dissolved-Oxygen (DO) feedback loops fall short. Cutting-edge ammonia and nitrate-based control strategies deliver more reliable aeration performance whilst protecting ecosystems and public health.

1. The Challenge of Aeration in Wastewater Treatment

It's essential for breaking down organic matter and converting harmful nitrogen compounds. Aeration supplies the oxygen needed by microbes to:

• Convert organic pollutants into harmless end-products

  
  

• Oxidise ammonia (NH₄⁺) to nitrate (NO₃⁻), then reduce NO₃⁻ to nitrogen gas (N₂)

Pushing air through reactors is energy-hungry, and with regulators demanding ever-lower nitrogen in effluent, plants must adopt more precise aeration controls to stay compliant and cost-effective.

2. Limitations of Traditional Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Control

DO control, while widely used, operates on a feedback loop, reacting after changes in oxygen demand occur resulting in several inefficiencies:

• Time Lag: Delayed responses to fluctuating loads result in suboptimal operation.  

  
  

• Over-aeration: Maintaining fixed DO setpoints often supplies more oxygen than biologically necessary, wasting significant energy.  

  
  

• Floc Disruption: Excessive aeration can damage microbial floc structures, leading to poor settling and higher suspended solids in effluent.  

  
  

• Denitrification Inhibition: High DO levels, necessary for nitrification, actively inhibit the subsequent denitrification process, as denitrifying bacteria preferentially use oxygen over nitrate.

• Indirect Measurement: DO is a surrogate for oxygen demand, not a direct indicator of nutrient conversion, limiting precise control.  

3. The Superiority of Nitrate and Ammonia-Based Control

This advanced approach leverages real-time measurements of ammonia and nitrate to provide direct, predictive insights into biological processes.

• Nitrification Control (Ammonia-Based)

  • Ammonia-Based Aeration Control (ABAC) dynamically adjusts DO setpoints and airflow based on real-time ammonia levels. If ammonia rises, aeration increases; if low, aeration is reduced, preventing over-aeration.  

• Denitrification Optimization (Nitrate-Based)

  • Real-time nitrate monitoring guides the optimization of internal mixed liquor recirculation (IMLR) and external carbon dosing. This ensures sufficient nitrate is available in anoxic zones for efficient conversion to nitrogen gas, maximizing internal carbon utilization and minimizing costly chemical additions.  

    
    

• Enabling Shortcut Nitrogen Removal

  • Precise nutrient control facilitates advanced, energy-efficient processes like shortcut biological nitrogen removal (SBNR), which can significantly reduce aeration requirements.  

4. Quantified Benefits and Operational Advantages

Plants that have adopted ammonia and nitrate-based control consistently report:

• Energy Savings of 10–65% in blower power. Brockton AWRF cut energy per million gallons by 45%, while Grapevine WWTP saw an 18.4% drop, saving nearly $30,000 annually.

  
  

• Superior Effluent Quality, optimized nitrification and denitrification ensure more complete nitrogen removal, meeting stringent discharge limits.  

  
  

• Enhanced Process Stability, dynamic control adapts to variable influent loads, leading to more resilient and stable treatment processes.

  
  

• Lower Chemical Costs, as targeted carbon dosing and reduced need for supplemental alkalinity (due to alkalinity recovery from denitrification) lower operational costs.  

  
  

• Rapid Payback, with most installations delivering a positive ROI within 6–24 months. Brockton AWRF and Grapevine WWTP saw ROI within 12–18 months purely from reduced power bills and minimized chemical use.

Transitioning from DO control to nutrient-driven aeration backed by continuous online analysis is transformative. Plants achieve cleaner effluent, major energy cuts, and strong financial returns.

If you’re facing tighter nitrogen caps, high or rising power bills, ammonia and nitrate-based control with real-time online monitoring could be the smartest upgrade to your wastewater treatment plant.

Contact Michael

View Water Quality Monitoring Instrumention